Passage of a Resolve and/or a legislative enactment, that makes clear to Maine’s Supreme Judicial Court (the Law Court) that any/all state “sovereign immunity” defenses to littoral upland owner claims of title to intertidal lands are “waived”. The question of ownership of these lands is critically important—the courts must fully and finally resolve this question. Further, if the Law Court does not proceed to reexamine the Bell cases, the Legislature should (by a Resolve or an enactment) direct the Attorney General’s Office to commence legal proceedings to resolve the question of ownership/title to Maine’s intertidal lands utilizing all of the…
READ FULL ARTICLEBy Edgar Allen Beem, Downeast Magazine — A noted law professor argues it’s high time to overturn a controversial 1989 low-water mark in Maine judicial history.
READ FULL ARTICLEBy George Smith, A Bangor Daily News Blog Book Review — In 1989, Maine’s Supreme Court took away our right to enjoy our ocean intertidal zones. Looking all the way back to when Maine was part of Massachusetts, the Justices ruled that our opportunities to enjoy the intertidal zones are limited to fishing, fouling, and navigation.
READ FULL ARTICLE